go_guy123
12-22 01:10 PM
could this be true?
GOP version means more enforcements for "undocumented" immigrants.
GOP version means more enforcements for "undocumented" immigrants.
wallpaper Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
newworld
04-06 11:36 AM
WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans and Democrats closed in on a last-minute compromise Thursday on legislation opening the way to legal status and eventual citizenship for many of the 11 million immigrants living in the United States illegally.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he had been assured President Bush supports the measure, and would publicly say so later in the day.
As outlined, the measure would provide for enhanced border security, regulate the future flow of immigrants into the United States and offer legalized status to the millions of men, women and children in the country unlawfully.
"We've had a huge breakthrough" overnight, said Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
Not done deal yet
Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, agreed, but cautioned that the agreement had not yet been sealed.
Even so, the presence of both leaders at a celebratory news conference underlined the expectation that the Senate could pass the most sweeping immigration bill in two decades, and act before leaving on a long vacation at the end of the week.
The developments marked a turnaround from Wednesday, when it appeared negotiations had faltered. The key sticking point involved the 11 million illegal immigrants in the country, and the struggle to provide them an opportunity to gain legal status without exposing lawmakers to the political charge that they were advocating amnesty for lawbreakers.
While final details were not available, in general, the compromise would require illegal immigrants who have been in the United States between two years and five years to return to their home country briefly, then re-enter as temporary workers. They could then begin a process of seeking citizenship.
Illegal immigrants here longer than five years would not be required to return home; those in the country less than two years would be required to leave without assurances of returning, and take their place in line with others seeking entry papers.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he had been assured President Bush supports the measure, and would publicly say so later in the day.
As outlined, the measure would provide for enhanced border security, regulate the future flow of immigrants into the United States and offer legalized status to the millions of men, women and children in the country unlawfully.
"We've had a huge breakthrough" overnight, said Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
Not done deal yet
Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, agreed, but cautioned that the agreement had not yet been sealed.
Even so, the presence of both leaders at a celebratory news conference underlined the expectation that the Senate could pass the most sweeping immigration bill in two decades, and act before leaving on a long vacation at the end of the week.
The developments marked a turnaround from Wednesday, when it appeared negotiations had faltered. The key sticking point involved the 11 million illegal immigrants in the country, and the struggle to provide them an opportunity to gain legal status without exposing lawmakers to the political charge that they were advocating amnesty for lawbreakers.
While final details were not available, in general, the compromise would require illegal immigrants who have been in the United States between two years and five years to return to their home country briefly, then re-enter as temporary workers. They could then begin a process of seeking citizenship.
Illegal immigrants here longer than five years would not be required to return home; those in the country less than two years would be required to leave without assurances of returning, and take their place in line with others seeking entry papers.
kewlchap
08-13 05:25 PM
Hi,
Can you tell me how you took an Infopass appointment since your PD is not current right now (will be current in Sept)? I was told that I can take infopass appointment only after my PD is current.
Can you tell me how you took an Infopass appointment since your PD is not current right now (will be current in Sept)? I was told that I can take infopass appointment only after my PD is current.
2011 Justin Bieber escorts Selena
andycool
05-18 10:35 AM
Friends:
Two weeks ago I received an RFE for my E-Filed I-131 Advance Parole.
They requested two passport-style Photos but didn't mention where to send the RFE response.
However, on the top right-corner (next to the US Dept. Homeland security Logo) on the RFE page, there is an address (P.O Box 852381 Mesquite, Texas 75185-2381).
Underneath of the Director signature it has Officer # 159.
I'm really confused
1. Which address to send the RFE response?
2. Attention to what??? (Should I put Attn: to this officer # 159)
Please guide me ASAP...
hello,
I got a ref for E filed EAD too , but they sent a yellow sheet which had address on that
and specifically said to keep that sheet on top when i send the photos.
the address you mentioned is what i sent my ref to .
Hope this helps
Thanks
Two weeks ago I received an RFE for my E-Filed I-131 Advance Parole.
They requested two passport-style Photos but didn't mention where to send the RFE response.
However, on the top right-corner (next to the US Dept. Homeland security Logo) on the RFE page, there is an address (P.O Box 852381 Mesquite, Texas 75185-2381).
Underneath of the Director signature it has Officer # 159.
I'm really confused
1. Which address to send the RFE response?
2. Attention to what??? (Should I put Attn: to this officer # 159)
Please guide me ASAP...
hello,
I got a ref for E filed EAD too , but they sent a yellow sheet which had address on that
and specifically said to keep that sheet on top when i send the photos.
the address you mentioned is what i sent my ref to .
Hope this helps
Thanks
more...
mk26
07-14 12:33 PM
For me, company is moving to another town but same county , will this a problem ? is there any link to DOL site for this info?
mrane1
10-15 03:36 AM
hi everyone
I m an MBA(major:general mba)student in a university in texas. I have an bachelors of engineeing (electrical & electronics)from india. I have found an desi employer who is ready to train me in SAP (FICO)functional and than place me on projects to diffeent companies. Since i m graduating in august 2008 ,At first i have to work for him on OPT and than in apil 2009 my employer will sponcer my h1 visa.
Now my question is....
1) can i work in SAP FICO functional , when i m on my opt?(opt means i have to work in a job directly related to my major field of study and i guess SAP is not related to my field major field of study)
2)will i have problems getting a h1b visa? (since General MBA and SAP are completely different fields )
Any comments or suggestions will be appreciated.
thanks
very simple answers
1) Yes
2) No
I m an MBA(major:general mba)student in a university in texas. I have an bachelors of engineeing (electrical & electronics)from india. I have found an desi employer who is ready to train me in SAP (FICO)functional and than place me on projects to diffeent companies. Since i m graduating in august 2008 ,At first i have to work for him on OPT and than in apil 2009 my employer will sponcer my h1 visa.
Now my question is....
1) can i work in SAP FICO functional , when i m on my opt?(opt means i have to work in a job directly related to my major field of study and i guess SAP is not related to my field major field of study)
2)will i have problems getting a h1b visa? (since General MBA and SAP are completely different fields )
Any comments or suggestions will be appreciated.
thanks
very simple answers
1) Yes
2) No
more...
pappu
01-22 03:33 PM
A member just posted on his blog-
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/blog.php?u=31942
This is creative and such ideas make the site lively in the new design. It will allow people get more than immigration and an experience of a community. Once we are a connected via various interests, discussions and features on the site, we will be able to better join hands together as a community on IV action items that is our focus.
abcdgc, pls also post this in the IV cricket social networking group so that all cricket lover IV members can network with each other and also see latest scores, pictures and news.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/blog.php?u=31942
This is creative and such ideas make the site lively in the new design. It will allow people get more than immigration and an experience of a community. Once we are a connected via various interests, discussions and features on the site, we will be able to better join hands together as a community on IV action items that is our focus.
abcdgc, pls also post this in the IV cricket social networking group so that all cricket lover IV members can network with each other and also see latest scores, pictures and news.
2010 Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
PennyLane
12-06 04:13 AM
I'm not an expert but from what I have read on various sites, nobody really knows. The thought is that the Nurse Relief bill stands little chance on it's own but may be bundled with something else to pass it.
I was told by my agency that if CIR passes, it will lift nurses out of the EB catagory and they will all be current. I have tried to find clarification on this but I don't think it is possible to speculate at this time.
I think the Healthcare reform is the first issue and then CIR will be addressed.
I have seen the figure 20,000 extra visas per year bandied round, these would be for the nurse only and the familly members would not take up any of this number. I have no idea how many nurses are waiting so don't know how this will impact on the overall figures - if indeed it ever comes to fruition.
I'm in turmoil over this as I had anticipated a lengthy wait and have embarked on a training programme to become a nurse practitioner and now worry I won't be able to complete it.
Being realistic, I would think if all EB visas become available overnight it will be sometime to process a large number, so it could take a good 12 months to get to my PD Jan 09 - I hope.
As I said at the start I am no expert so am only conveying my understanding and would welcome anyone who can correct any misunderstanding on my part.
I was told by my agency that if CIR passes, it will lift nurses out of the EB catagory and they will all be current. I have tried to find clarification on this but I don't think it is possible to speculate at this time.
I think the Healthcare reform is the first issue and then CIR will be addressed.
I have seen the figure 20,000 extra visas per year bandied round, these would be for the nurse only and the familly members would not take up any of this number. I have no idea how many nurses are waiting so don't know how this will impact on the overall figures - if indeed it ever comes to fruition.
I'm in turmoil over this as I had anticipated a lengthy wait and have embarked on a training programme to become a nurse practitioner and now worry I won't be able to complete it.
Being realistic, I would think if all EB visas become available overnight it will be sometime to process a large number, so it could take a good 12 months to get to my PD Jan 09 - I hope.
As I said at the start I am no expert so am only conveying my understanding and would welcome anyone who can correct any misunderstanding on my part.
more...
rolrblade
02-21 08:52 AM
You could try to reopen the case with Supporting evidence of ill health and age. This is a long shot, but a good attroney should be able to pose a compelling argument. Also, try to get an infopass appointment and talk to someone about your options.
hair Justin Bieber amp; Selena Gomez#39;s
atul555
07-28 11:12 AM
You can have the new stamping done before 6 months of expiry of the current stamp in ur passport or within 1 year of it's expiry.
more...
eager_immi
07-18 03:47 PM
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
hot justin bieber and selena gomez
Hope_GC
03-12 09:52 PM
Great Job Mark.
Incredible, Appreciate your continuing efforts after getting Green Card.
Incredible, Appreciate your continuing efforts after getting Green Card.
more...
house Justin Bieber ?n? Selena
raysaikat
01-24 04:03 PM
Hi glus,
Thanks for the reply can you or someone clarigy this,
What if the validity date of H1 is before the validity date of F1. In other words if the validity date of H1 is 10/1/2009 to 9/30/2012 and the validity date of F1 is 12/15/2009 to D/s but the approval date of F1 is on 7th Jan 2010 and the approval date of H1 is on 14th jan 2010.
Thanks
Your VISA status should be determined by the I-94 you got last. Which one is it?
Thanks for the reply can you or someone clarigy this,
What if the validity date of H1 is before the validity date of F1. In other words if the validity date of H1 is 10/1/2009 to 9/30/2012 and the validity date of F1 is 12/15/2009 to D/s but the approval date of F1 is on 7th Jan 2010 and the approval date of H1 is on 14th jan 2010.
Thanks
Your VISA status should be determined by the I-94 you got last. Which one is it?
tattoo Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
raysaikat
12-04 11:52 AM
I had a lot of emotional and financial distress upon my graduation and I didn't get to apply for OPT. What do I do?
I mean I know I need to go speak with the dept that handles intl students in my school?
But, like, any pointers or information to please assist me?
Any constructive information/help, will be useful!
Also, I am looking into getting into graduate school within the next yr to yr and half!
If you graduated 1 year ago and was no longer a student in this last year, and did not apply for OPT before graduation, then you are already out of status - your F1 status ceased when you graduated. Moreover, your I-94 most likely said D/S. So the I-94 covered your stay only during the time you maintained F1 status. So you have been accruing illegal presence time. 6 month of illegal presence would trigger 3 year ban on reentering US; and 1 year or more would trigger a 10 year ban.
The prudent thing for you to do is to go back to your home country, and come back with a proper VISA.
I mean I know I need to go speak with the dept that handles intl students in my school?
But, like, any pointers or information to please assist me?
Any constructive information/help, will be useful!
Also, I am looking into getting into graduate school within the next yr to yr and half!
If you graduated 1 year ago and was no longer a student in this last year, and did not apply for OPT before graduation, then you are already out of status - your F1 status ceased when you graduated. Moreover, your I-94 most likely said D/S. So the I-94 covered your stay only during the time you maintained F1 status. So you have been accruing illegal presence time. 6 month of illegal presence would trigger 3 year ban on reentering US; and 1 year or more would trigger a 10 year ban.
The prudent thing for you to do is to go back to your home country, and come back with a proper VISA.
more...
pictures hair justin bieber and selena gomez selena gomez and justin bieber beach
nk2
07-21 04:22 PM
/\/\/\/\/\
dresses Shirtless Justin Bieber
DDLMODES
07-09 06:51 PM
Hello everybody,
First of all I must appologize because I mentioned this in the forum before but that was a different question that I asked.
My wife's Labor lists a 4 year degree with a BS in Mechanical Engineering as a requirement.
We filed I-140 with her old H1B evaluation which says she has a 4 year degree in Civil Engineering (stupid me :mad: ).
I found another evaluator who looked closely and gave us an evaluation for BS in Mechanical Engineering because her degree is way closer to the Mechanical than it is to the Civil Eng.
Will USCIS reject this I-140 on the spot based on the fact that she doesn't meet the requirements or issue an RFE ? If they issue an RFE and we send the Mechanical Eng. evaluation, will the fact that we filed first with the Civil Eng evaluation cause any problems ? Are we assuming the worst and is not such a big deal ??
She worked on H1B for 7 years as a Mech Eng and this is NOT a labour substitution.
Thanks for any help !
:(
First of all I must appologize because I mentioned this in the forum before but that was a different question that I asked.
My wife's Labor lists a 4 year degree with a BS in Mechanical Engineering as a requirement.
We filed I-140 with her old H1B evaluation which says she has a 4 year degree in Civil Engineering (stupid me :mad: ).
I found another evaluator who looked closely and gave us an evaluation for BS in Mechanical Engineering because her degree is way closer to the Mechanical than it is to the Civil Eng.
Will USCIS reject this I-140 on the spot based on the fact that she doesn't meet the requirements or issue an RFE ? If they issue an RFE and we send the Mechanical Eng. evaluation, will the fact that we filed first with the Civil Eng evaluation cause any problems ? Are we assuming the worst and is not such a big deal ??
She worked on H1B for 7 years as a Mech Eng and this is NOT a labour substitution.
Thanks for any help !
:(
more...
makeup Selena+Gomez in Justin Bieber
sunnymit
07-18 10:55 PM
i am switching employers and i have about 10k in my 401k with current employer. my next employer does not have the option to start 401k until after one year of service.i am looking for options to rollover my 401k to a IRA in a company. does anyone have any recommendations?thanks in advance
I still have my 401K from my old job that I quit about 3 yrs back into the same (company's) account. The reason I didn't roll them into IRA is that I prob would have made the same selection of mutual funds that I currently have in my 401K. The company is stable so no worries there. Point is, move your money only if you think it will serve you a better purpose or else wait for your new 401K to kick in and after that just roll over the other account directly into the new one...
Just my 2 cents, of course...
I still have my 401K from my old job that I quit about 3 yrs back into the same (company's) account. The reason I didn't roll them into IRA is that I prob would have made the same selection of mutual funds that I currently have in my 401K. The company is stable so no worries there. Point is, move your money only if you think it will serve you a better purpose or else wait for your new 401K to kick in and after that just roll over the other account directly into the new one...
Just my 2 cents, of course...
girlfriend justin bieber and selena gomez
Sparkling
04-26 04:37 PM
Dear Lawyer,
I posted my story in "all other green card issues" I'm sorry I don't know how to link it.
I am married to a US citizen - married since 10/23/04 - we have lived in the US before where I obtained a conditional green card : given 01/17/06 expired 01/17/08. We left the US in may of 07 to live in denmark (my home country) and thought the conditional green card was "gone" when it expired and did not apply to remove conditions in time.
In 2009 we decided to return to the states - I came here 10/16/09 on a visa waiver. In december 09 we filed i130 and in march i485 thinking we had to start over on the process of getting a green card.
April 8th -10 we recieved a denial letter saying:
"A review of agency records indicates that the beneficiary has already aquired lawful permanent resident status on january 17 2006 through other means"
" therefore , the beneficiary is not eligible for the benefit sought and this additional petition is denied"
" This denial will have no adverse effect on the lawful permanent residence status that the beneficiary has previously aquired"
Attached to the letter is an appeal form.
So my query now is: since they already consider me a lawful permanent resident according to that letter - how do I go about getting my green card? and what happens to the i485 that they still have in initial review?
My husband and I are very confused about all this - we were told we had to reapply so we are puzzled about that denial letter. Customer service at uscis only reiterates the content of their website and we cannot get through to anyone that can shed any light on this. Infopass is not available in our area either, so I turned to this forum.
Than you so much for your time in considering this matter and for any information you might have for us.
Sincerely,
A danish citizen :-)
I posted my story in "all other green card issues" I'm sorry I don't know how to link it.
I am married to a US citizen - married since 10/23/04 - we have lived in the US before where I obtained a conditional green card : given 01/17/06 expired 01/17/08. We left the US in may of 07 to live in denmark (my home country) and thought the conditional green card was "gone" when it expired and did not apply to remove conditions in time.
In 2009 we decided to return to the states - I came here 10/16/09 on a visa waiver. In december 09 we filed i130 and in march i485 thinking we had to start over on the process of getting a green card.
April 8th -10 we recieved a denial letter saying:
"A review of agency records indicates that the beneficiary has already aquired lawful permanent resident status on january 17 2006 through other means"
" therefore , the beneficiary is not eligible for the benefit sought and this additional petition is denied"
" This denial will have no adverse effect on the lawful permanent residence status that the beneficiary has previously aquired"
Attached to the letter is an appeal form.
So my query now is: since they already consider me a lawful permanent resident according to that letter - how do I go about getting my green card? and what happens to the i485 that they still have in initial review?
My husband and I are very confused about all this - we were told we had to reapply so we are puzzled about that denial letter. Customer service at uscis only reiterates the content of their website and we cannot get through to anyone that can shed any light on this. Infopass is not available in our area either, so I turned to this forum.
Than you so much for your time in considering this matter and for any information you might have for us.
Sincerely,
A danish citizen :-)
hairstyles hair Justin Bieber And Selena
FinalGC
03-11 01:11 PM
Make sure that your new reporting manager is aware of your GC process. I had a manager earlier, who midway through my LC process decided he will not support the GC, since he was not my manager who hired me, since i was moved to another group, after my LC was filed...........If needed go up the ladder for buy-in
nefrateedi
08-01 05:18 PM
can you please let me know when is the USCIS fee increase is scheduled from?
Also, say for I-485 the fee is 1000, does this fee include for spouse also? Or For spouse, the fee is extra $1000 ie the fee is per applicant or per family
I have the same question for EAD/travel docs
The new fees are in effect as of July 30, 2007. See below for the new fee schedule.
http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/G-1055.pdf
Also, say for I-485 the fee is 1000, does this fee include for spouse also? Or For spouse, the fee is extra $1000 ie the fee is per applicant or per family
I have the same question for EAD/travel docs
The new fees are in effect as of July 30, 2007. See below for the new fee schedule.
http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/G-1055.pdf
solaris27
10-12 04:13 PM
you have to wait till 180 days .
Your employer can revoke 140 in once that you filed i-485 within 180 days .
So you have to make friendship with him till 180 pass .
Your employer can revoke 140 in once that you filed i-485 within 180 days .
So you have to make friendship with him till 180 pass .
No comments:
Post a Comment